{"id":548,"date":"2025-09-21T11:01:58","date_gmt":"2025-09-21T11:01:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sleepystork.com\/?p=548"},"modified":"2025-09-25T10:15:57","modified_gmt":"2025-09-25T10:15:57","slug":"dps-test-scores-improved-but-disturbingly-confirm-persistent-inequalities-opinion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/sleepystork.com\/index.php\/2025\/09\/21\/dps-test-scores-improved-but-disturbingly-confirm-persistent-inequalities-opinion\/","title":{"rendered":"DPS test scores improved, but disturbingly confirm persistent inequalities (Opinion)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Denver Public Schools recently released state assessment scores for around 55,000 students<\/a> who participated in CMAS and SAT testing, claiming, \u201c\u2026 the district is making a real difference for all of our students.\u201d Digging into the data (as EDUCATE Denver and other civic leaders did recently with an independent data analyst), a more nuanced story unfolds.<\/p>\n

It is a proverbial \u201ctale of two cities.\u201d One plot line reveals that approximately three quarters of DPS white students are proficient in reading, outscoring their Colorado peers by 17 points. A parallel tale suggests that of Black, Hispanic, and low-income students who 70% or more are not proficient in reading and, in contrast to their white peers, underperform similar students statewide.<\/p>\n

These same terrible patterns hold true in math, where over 80% of Black and Hispanic students perform below grade level and behind peers statewide. We are not making a \u201creal difference\u201d for most of our kids as 65% of students are Black or Hispanic. In fact, the long-term trend suggests that, for many, the situation is only getting worse.<\/p>\n

The data is even more confusing. Over three years, test scores for all student groups went up. Up is good and we credit DPS, generally, for this trend. However, when you put the starting line at 2019, scores have just now surpassed pre-pandemic levels for DPS white students, while scores among DPS Black and Latino students are still recovering on most metrics. There is nothing exceptional about the recent rise \u2013 we are merely back to where we started, for some.<\/p>\n

\n

Search your school’s 2025 CMAS scores<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);<\/p>\n

There is a glimmer of promise when we observe growth scores. These scores reflect performance relative to an expected amount of learning for any given school year, based on typical performance of similar students the previous year. For most DPS subgroups, growth was slightly higher relative to state peers. But there, again, the group that is growing fastest is white students. Most minority students are not growing as much as peers or quickly enough to ever achieve grade level proficiency. Unless DPS can radically accelerate growth rates for historically underserved students, the nearly 50 point achievement gap between white students and students of color will only expand.<\/p>\n

It is worth noting that DPS’ actual performance bears no relationship to the wildly unrealistic targets proposed by the superintendent and approved by the school board in January. DPS set strategic targets for minority student subgroups between 10 and 20 points higher than those actually achieved. This failure is not surprising as DPS did not articulate a realistic plan for lifting up the achievement of chronically underperforming groups.\u00a0It is surprising, however, in the context of DPS\u2019 stated success.<\/p>\n

We celebrate the fact that some schools in the district are defying their \u201cdemographic destiny.\u201d As measured by test scores, students of color are better served by charter schools than by district-managed schools, and some DPS charter schools have made great headway in closing the gap. There are also some district-managed schools exceeding the odds, which begs the question: What steps is DPS taking to identify and scale strategies that work?<\/p>\n

As members of EDUCATE Denver, we invited the superintendent to speak to a forum of community members to find out. We were interested in learning about DPS\u2019 bright spots, challenges, course corrections and efforts to leverage best practice. The Superintendent declined the invitation, refused to send a delegate, and countered that the district would hold its own forum next year \u2013 a decision we certainly hope was not motivated by the upcoming Board of Education election this November.<\/p>\n

When test scores were publicly released in August, the district celebrated recent gains without putting them into proper perspective. Community members deserve a fuller picture, which we attempt to provide here:<\/p>\n

With a budget of $1.5 billion and just over 90,000 students, DPS spends $11,452 per student each year. According to the data, less than one in two students are proficient in literacy and fewer than one in three students are proficient in math. Shareholders (taxpayers) of any other $1.5 billion organization would demand a complete overall of such a failing institution. (In the case of a $1.5 billion public entity whose core business is students\u2019 futures, a more practical solution is to follow the evidence.)<\/p>\n