Colorado isn’t ready for major changes to our election system, even if adopting an all-party primary and ranked-choice general election could mean more and perhaps better choices for voters in futur
Endorsements
If a crime or tragedy happens in Colorado, the second person a victim talks to after the police is often an advocate from one of the dozens of organizations primarily funded by a dwindling pot of fede
Endorsements
I find it fascinating and ironic that this same DOJ has chronically overlooked similar issues in regard to the handling of the migrants who have been systematically grabbed without warrants. — David
Columnists
Colorado isn’t ready for major changes to our election system, even if adopting an all-party primary and ranked-choice general election could mean more and perhaps better choices for voters in futur
EndorsementsColorado isn’t ready for major changes to our election system, even if adopting an all-party primary and ranked-choice general election could mean more and perhaps better choices for voters in future years.
Tina Peters’ saga of dragging Colorado’s election system through the mud just came to an end this month when she was sentenced to nine years in jail and prison. And despite humiliating smack-downs in the legal system of other notorious election conspiracy theorists — Jenna Ellis, John Eastman and more — they and others continue to cast doubt on our election systems.
We know that Colorado’s elections are the “gold standard.”
However, enough Colorado voters still question the integrity of our elections that we think implementing a drastic change now could be disastrous.
Proposition 131 would change how the state elects candidates for the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives and statewide offices for governor, secretary of state, attorney general, treasurer, state Board of Education and University of Colorado regents. Additionally, it would change how candidates are elected to the Colorado General Assembly — House and Senate. It would not change county, municipal or special district elections.
The first change would be to eliminate primaries — for both the Republican and Democratic parties — and instead create a single primary ballot for candidates from all parties including unaffiliated candidates.
The top four candidates would then advance to the general election ballot, where voters would be asked to “rank some or all of the candidates for each office in order of preference.” Here’s where ranked-choice voting comes in — if someone’s first choice proves to be unpopular, their vote goes to their second choice, then third choice, until a single candidate gets more than 50% of the vote.
This system requires faith in the election administrator not to monkey around with the totals. The complicated reallocation of votes is done by computer, sometimes in real time, meaning a candidate might be “out” with the first batch of ballots but “back in” with the second batch. We were reassured that hand counts of Colorado’s secure paper ballot system — as required by law in close elections or if a candidate is willing to pay for it — would still be possible. The recounts would be expensive and time-consuming.
Implementing this on a statewide basis will take money and time, including creating a way to perform a risk-limiting audit with independent software to make certain that the original tally is correct.
While the actual ranking process is fairly straightforward, Colorado voters will have to pay close attention to make sure they don’t accidentally spoil their ballot by ranking two first-choice candidates or other easy mistakes. Also, having city and county elections that are not part of the open primary adds to the confusion, especially for unaffiliated voters who will still get both the Republican and Democrat primary ballots but can only participate in one.
Someone like Tina Peters would have a field day casting doubt on election results from this system. Across the nation, we’ve seen that hand counts closely matching machine counts don’t dissuade conspiracy theorists, even when coupled with detailed lists of voters who participated in the election.
For Colorado to transition to such a system will take time and trust. We’d need something closer to a super-majority vote than a mere 50% win this November to convince us Coloradans are ready to fight this election battle.
There is one guaranteed clear advantage of Proposition 131 — a candidate would have to get at least 50% of the vote to win. No longer would third-party candidates serve as only spoilers, but voters would feel liberated to cast a ballot for someone unaffiliated or libertarian without throwing away their vote.
Kent Thiry, the former CEO of DaVita, is financially backing the effort to bring ranked choice voting to Colorado. He says the goal is to create an election system that does three things: 1. Levels the playing field in the primary for all candidates regardless of party, giving Colorado’s huge segment of unaffiliated voters a voice in the nominee selection process. 2. Because most voters don’t participate in the primary, give voters a choice in the general election by having four candidates advance. 3. Require that any candidate get majority support to win.
“The problem right now … there can be no debating that voters lack choice. That they get to cast very few meaningful votes in a general election and that spoilers play a big role,” Thiry said.
These are goals worth of pursuing and voting “no” on Proposition 131 doesn’t mean Colorado won’t eventually tackle the complex process of improving elections.
And Thiry has already helped improve Colorado’s system by opening up primaries to unaffiliated voters. Rather than spending millions of dollars to upend the system completely, the state could work on getting voters engaged with the existing system. If turnout was the same for caucuses and primaries as it was for the general election, Colorado would have more choices and candidates more aligned with the average voter.
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.
If a crime or tragedy happens in Colorado, the second person a victim talks to after the police is often an advocate from one of the dozens of organizations primarily funded by a dwindling pot of fede
EndorsementsIf a crime or tragedy happens in Colorado, the second person a victim talks to after the police is often an advocate from one of the dozens of organizations primarily funded by a dwindling pot of federal money.
These organizations offer a critical service for Coloradans. Whether it’s a domestic violence organization offering shelter to a mother and her two children after police arrive to a dangerous situation involving a gun or a volunteer from the district attorney’s office sitting for hours with a family after someone has committed suicide in a home – victims’ advocates are essential to helping Coloradans recover from the unimaginable.
However, the funding from the federal Victims Crimes Act is not only unreliable but is drying up, leaving these organizations across the state to make tough decisions about how many victims they can serve and the level of service they can offer. Does the mother fleeing her own home get a week’s stay in the shelter and legal aid, or just one night and an ex-parte form to file on her own? Does a family get put in a hotel room while the location of the suicide is processed by detectives, or must they find their own place to stay at 3 a.m. without a credit card or any other personal belongings?
Coloradans have a chance during this election to give these critical services the funding they need.
Proposition KK would levy a state-wide 6.5% excise tax on large gun and ammunition sellers in Colorado.
The hope behind this new tax is not to reduce the number of guns sold in the state, but rather to generate revenue to fund critical services for the victims of crime. Not all crisis services involve a gun, but we do know that if a gun is involved in a crime, domestic violence incident or suicide attempt, the outcome is worse.
Already, the federal government charges an 11% tax on most gun and ammunition sales. Colorado lawmakers decided last year to ask voters to add another 6.5% onto that to fund state-wide victims programs. The fund will raise an estimated $39 million and the first $30 million will go through the existing board to award grants for victim assistance. After that, $8 million will go to the Behavioral and Mental Health Cash Fund ($5 million of which is earmarked for veterans programs) and $1 million to the School Security Cash Fund, both of which are administered by lawmakers in the General Assembly.
Proposition KK is a smart way to assess a tax directly on objects that play a role in making crime worse. The tax will only be levied on gun dealers and manufacturers who sell more than $20,000 worth of new guns and ammunition every year, meaning the tax won’t hit small gun sellers or used gun dealers. Sales to police officers or members of the military are exempted because we do need a well-regulated militia or, in this case, a police force.
Additionally, we are thrilled that the bill does not create a new program for administering grants to victims’ advocates; instead, it relies on the existing Crime Victim Services Advisory Board to make recommendations to the Department and the Division of Criminal Justice.
We would ask that future gun owners in Colorado view this tax not as a punishment but as an investment in services should their gun ever fall into the wrong hands or be used in a tragedy or crime. These services are essential.
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.
Updated Oct. 22, 2024 at 6:17 p.m. Due to an editor’s error this editorial had the wrong amount the tax would raise in the first year. The estimate is $39 million.
I find it fascinating and ironic that this same DOJ has chronically overlooked similar issues in regard to the handling of the migrants who have been systematically grabbed without warrants. — David
ColumnistsRe: “DOJ investigating state’s prisons,” Dec. 9 news story
I read with great interest that President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice is “investigating whether Colorado prisons are violating the constitutional rights of the state’s adult inmates and youth detainees through excessive force, inadequate medical care and nutrition …”
I find it fascinating and ironic that this same DOJ has chronically overlooked similar issues in regard to the handling of the migrants who have been systematically grabbed without warrants, and imprisoned without due process in facilities that have been documented as being overpopulated, unsanitary, and with inadequate nutrition or medical care. I’ve only heard of a few, if any, interventions to undo these chronic civil rights violations.
David Thomas, Denver
Re: “Federal court denies latest request to leave prison,” Dec. 9 news story
In the article, President Donald Trump refers to Colorado Gov. Jared Polis as a “sleazebag.” Trump seems to have numerous undesirable traits, but one of his favorites seems to be derogatory name-calling. He seems to have a less-than-complimentary name for anyone who is not loyal to him, anyone he disagrees with, such as journalists, etc. According to artificial intelligence, this form of name-calling is most prevalent among children, which seems to fall in line with his level of maturity, sophistication and intelligence!
Steve Nash, Centennial
Further proof that the NFL/Vegas betting has no respect for the Broncos. The Broncos currently own the number one seed in the AFC, have not lost at home this year, and are on a 10-game winning streak. Still, Denver is the underdog in next week’s home game against Green Bay.
Leroy M. Martinez, Denver
Re: “State Sen. Winter killed in I-25 crash,” Nov. 28 news story
Life can change within a second. The entire trajectory of someone’s future can be altered in the blink of an eye. I would’ve never believed that the section of the highway, Interstate 25, I travel on so often, the one that blurs by in a moment, could ever be remembered as something so tragic. That highway is now a distressing symbol of how life is a gift and can be snatched away at any random moment.
Recently, two accidents occurred on the northbound I-25 near Dry Creek. Faith Winter, a Colorado senator, was killed, and three others were injured. However, it is important to remember Sen. Winter not the way she passed but how she lived.
Reporter Katie Langford reminded us about how Sen. Winter fought to make Colorado a better place her entire life. She strongly advocated for and brought paid family leave to the state of Colorado, passed an important transportation bill to improve roads and public transportation, and fought against workplace sexual harassment, making impactful changes wherever she went.
Sen. Winter made history and brought positive changes to many Coloradans and she will be honored and remembered in our hearts for years to come.
Life is so short and unpredictable. Those who realize the importance of living each day like it’s your last and doing good in the world never really pass away. They live in everyone’s hearts, and the memory of them lasts for a lifetime.
Swatiswagatika Nayak, Castle Pines
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.
Steve Sack, The Minneapolis Star-Tribune Jeff Koterba, Omaha World-Herald
Cartoons
After six losses in the semifinals, after falling in their lone title game appearance in 2004, thirty years of Dakota Ridge dreaming awoke to a blissful reality on Sunday morning.
The Eagle has lande
ColumnistsFORT COLLINS — What began as forts made of pads as a toddler ended with a hug made of tears as a senior.
His teammates clearing the field at Canvas Stadium, posing for snapshots that they can live in forever, Kellen Behrendsen raced up the stairs at the 30-yard line. He greeted both sets of his grandparents, brother and mom with an embrace decades in the making.
Behrendsen was born into the Dakota Ridge community, a bundle of energy, curiosity and light.
And on a chilly Saturday night, he became his father’s sonshine.
Behrendsen and his dad Jeremiah guided Dakota Ridge to its first state football championship, overwhelming Palmer Ridge 38-14. After six losses in the semifinals, after falling in their lone title game appearance in 2004, thirty years of Dakota Ridge dreaming awoke to a blissful reality on Sunday morning.
The Eagle has landed. DRidge Nation, you are champions.

“I have been here my whole life, raised here. I started going to practices when I was little. I was making forts out of the pads, playing with other kids,” Kellen Behrendsen said. “This is a full circle moment. Knowing I was able to bring this home with my brothers on the team and my dad, it means so much.”
Father knew this was possible before the coach. Jeremiah watched his son grow up competing with great kids who were surrounded by strong families. This is the kind of life he wanted for when moving from Akron to Littleton, and taking a job as the Eagles freshman team offensive coordinator in 2004.
“I love this community,” coach Behrendsen said. “I absolutely thought (Kellen) might win state someday because I knew this group had a chance to do something special if they came together the right way.”
The bonds begin forming on two feeders during middle school. When the players morphed into one as freshmen, the vision began to crystallize like a Polaroid picture. That season the Eagles averaged roughly 50 points per game and allowed 50.
“We still had all the same guys, and we kept getting better,” said star receiver Nathan Rodriguez. “We knew our senior year was going to be our year.”
Behrendsen felt responsible for getting the Eagles across the finish line. Consistency was paramount. As a first-year starter last season, he completed 67.6 % of his passes for 12 touchdowns and six interceptions. For a kid who wants to be engineer, he knew there were bigger numbers available if he solved the equation of work, film and calm.
Against an undefeated Bears team, Behrendsen was more accurate than a DNA test. He completed his first nine passes. He had 167 yards on his first seven attempts.
On the Eagles’ opening drive, he connected on a swing pass to Landon Kalsbeck. The one-man wrecking ball who is headed to Washington State broke three tackles and juked two other defenders for a 44-yard score.

Following a Jack Offerdahl interception, Behrendsen took the shotgun snap and fired a dart to Jaxson Arnold, who raced 84 yards untouched to the end zone.
When the Eagles were briefly threatened in the third quarter, Behrendsen climbed the pocket and launched a ball 50 yards in that air that Rodriguez hauled in for a diving touchdown worthy of SportsCenter.
His subsequent celebration – think Rob Gronkowski with the Patriots – provided an exclamation point, showing why Dakota Ridge outscored opponents 565-168 this season.
“I absolutely burned the DB. I was a little bit overwhelmed with excitement and spiked the ball. But I think it was fair to do that, don’t you?” Rodriguez said. “My quarterback puts trust in me. And he absolutely put on a show. He does this every game. He’s got the arm, and he believes in us, and it’s why he is so good.”
What makes Behrendsen special is the work performed in the shadows. He stands 5-foot-11, weighs 155 pounds. What he lacks in physicality, he makes up for with efficiency. Behrendsen finished the season with 235 completions in 286 attempts, an alarming 82.1 percent, with 42 touchdowns and three interceptions.
He added more helium to statistics on Saturday, going for 14-for-16 for 259 yards and four scores.
“He is really smart and an incredible decision maker. Experience is the difference this season. And he has grown into being a leader,” coach Behrendsen said. “As he played better, his teammates started to believing in and his confidence grew tenfold.”
Father and son tried to keep this past week as normal as possible. They lived in cliches. Kept everything the same even when they knew the stakes were higher, the end was closer. The pair tries to avoid football talk at home, where coach estimates he is dad “90 percent of the time.” And this week, they were not about to let stress steal their joy.
“After practices we did some fun stuff,” Kellen said. “When it snowed, we went out and shoveled the ‘DR’ out front of the school so everybody still knew we were playing. … But honestly, it still hasn’t hit me that I am not going to play for him again.”
The son plans to continue to his career. He has attracted interested from five Division III and Division II schools, including CSU-Pueblo. Dad will keep coaching.
Long ago, he realized something very cool about giving up your time for children who are not your own. You gain another life.
You become part of something bigger. As the Dakota Ridge players celebrated, as tears rolled down cheeks, Jeremiah basked in the glow of his son, overcome with gratitude on what they had done.
“We have worked really hard to cultivate the type of community where everyone has your back. We have worked really hard to get to this point. I have watched great coaches and players try. We were building and building and building,” coach Behrendsen said. “This was for DRidge Nation. This championship was built on the backs of 30 years of people. A lot of them are here today. It is special.”
Coloradans should vote to retain Justice Monica M. Márquez and send a message to those wielding her retention as a political cudgel that far-right extremists cannot bully Colorado justices.
EndorsementsAngry messages started rolling into the Colorado Supreme Court in December after a majority of judges ruled that President Donald Trump was not eligible to appear on the Colorado primary ballot because he had “engaged in” insurrection. Soon the FBI was investigating threats of violence because some Trump supporters had taken their legal disagreement with the court too far.
Now, Colorado’s Supreme Court Chief Justice Monica M. Márquez is being targeted again, this time by groups urging Colorado voters not to retain her on the bench in November’s election. Márquez, who grew up in Grand Junction and was appointed by Gov. Bill Ritter to the Supreme Court in 2010, is the only Supreme Court judge on the ballot this fall who joined the majority opinion in Anderson v. Griswold.
Coloradans should vote to retain Márquez and send a message to those wielding her retention as a political cudgel that far-right extremists cannot bully Colorado justices.
The four justices were sound in their finding last year that Trump had orchestrated a vast insurrection attempt that culminated with the violent Jan. 6 attempt to prevent Congress from seating Joe Biden as president.
“We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us,” wrote the four-justice majority late last year. “We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”
In other words, the justices stood strong against threats and angry messages flooding into the courts. The majority applied the clear language of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, a guarantee that Americans not be governed by someone who had betrayed the cornerstone of American democracy by treason or insurrection. The facts of the case had been litigated in a lower court that also found Trump had engaged in insurrection.
A national social issue non-profit called the Article III Project launched a campaign not to retain Márquez.
“Monica Márquez attempted to disenfranchise over 550,000 Colorado Trump primary voters,” Mike Davis, founder and president of the nonprofit group, told The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel earlier this month. “She doesn’t respect democracy and the rule of law. So it’s time for Colorado voters to fire Monica Márquez in this November 5th election.”
This is utter nonsense.
The U.S. Supreme Court did strike down their decision with a unanimous ruling that states could not enforce the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on their own. But, this ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court was based entirely on their interpretation of Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, giving Congress the power to enforce the post-Civil War amendment. The justices lamented the “chaos” that would come if states were able to enforce the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment without a federal process spelled out in legislation for doing so. Perhaps, if the U.S. Supreme Court had more courage, they would have been less worried about “chaos” and more worried with enforcing the U.S. Constitution faithfully.
In other words, Colorado’s justices did what the nation’s top justices were too afraid to do – stand up for the amendment as written, no matter the difficulty that could ensue if enforced by a state-court.
We would ignore this fringe movement to punish a Colorado justice for her part in a sound legal ruling if it weren’t for a compounding threat to her retention. The Colorado Springs Gazette recommended this week that none of the three justices up for consideration be retained for office.
Their logic is far more sound — the Colorado Supreme Court recently weathered a tremendous scandal under now-retired Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Coats. Combined the two efforts may have the unintended consequences of ejecting a very fine justice from Colorado’s Supreme Court.
We too have expressed discontent with Coats’ involvement in the scandal, and frustration with the lack of transparency into the investigation afforded by his replacement Justice Brian Boatright who is also up for retention this year. But Coats is long gone from the court and there is no evidence that Boatright or any of the other justices were aware of the hush-money contract awarded to a former judicial employee.
We hope voters retain Márquez, Boatright and Justice Maria E. Berkenkotter.
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.
The grand opening of the Cleo Parker Robinson Dance expansion is far more than a ribbon-cutting. It is a powerful reminder of the remarkable ability of the arts to break down barriers, promote greater
OpinionJust on the other side of the holiday season, Cleo Parker Robinson Dance, the organization that helped raise me and that I currently lead, is celebrating the grand opening of our new Center for the Healing Arts.
As I think about this milestone, I’m reminded of a Denver interview a decade ago with the great Black American ballerina Misty Copeland as she reflected on how dance rescued her from a chaotic childhood to help her find her voice through artistic expression.
“…Once I discovered ballet it was so clear to me that it was such an escape from all of the obstacles at home … And when I was in the studio is really the first time that there was this clarity, and it was something that was so beautiful that again was my own. And I never experienced that as a child. And to this day it still is an escape for me,” she said.
Copeland was addressing young girls, but her comments resonate for anyone curious about the power of dance. The arts have been a balm for the soul, for individuals young and old, from every background, and political persuasion. It is something Cleo Parker Robinson Dance has understood for our 55 years of existence.
Our 25,000 square-foot expansion, adjoining our longtime home in the Historic Shorter African Methodist Episcopal Church (100 years old in 2026), is not just a beautiful edifice. It represents a melding of the old and new to forge an expansive future.
My parents grew up a couple of blocks away and my late dad, Tom Robinson, attended Boy Scouts in the church’s garden-level gymnasium. Thirty-eight years ago, CPRD transformed that very gym into dance studios and the sanctuary upstairs into a theatre that has been home to more than 30 performing arts companies from around the metropolitan area.
But we always dreamed of a new facility to match the quality of the organization’s educational and artistic programs.
After fits and starts, including surviving the pandemic and price escalations, we launched a multi-phased capital campaign. In 2021, CPRD purchased the historic building and adjacent land, and today stands a new four-level structure that includes a state-of-the-art theater with world-class acoustics, new studios, rehearsal spaces, and gathering areas designed for our community wellness programs.
With an annual budget of $2.5 million, CPRD has always punched above its weight, but we would not have succeeded in raising the $25 million for the expansion without the support and collaboration of the Denver arts, political and philanthropic infrastructure.
What we have accomplished is a testament to the galvanizing power of bringing people together and the learning that brings about. Through an extensive public-private partnership, funding for the project came from every corner of our city and state.
Community foundations, political representatives and corporate partners stepped forward as well as individual donors from across the community (who contributed nearly 20 percent of the total cost) — proof that Cleo Parker Robinson Dance is a valued asset to Denver and Colorado.
For five decades, we have championed the arts to spark curiosity and learning, promote healing and foster belonging. My mother, our founder, Cleo Parker Robinson, established the company after earning double degrees in dance and psychology.
Her passion and vision have integrated the arts and behavioral health into award-winning programs. Those early “healing power of art” workshops have morphed into the new Center for the Healing Arts. Our work is not only cross cultural, but intergenerational, multi-regional and deeply rooted in African Diasporic traditions.
It’s a big reason for our success. Over the decades, we’ve trained thousands of young dancers in ballet, hip-hop, jazz, African dance, and tap. Our company has performed all over the world, and touched every corner of Colorado, making more than 2,000 school visits to reach kids from pre-K to high school who might not otherwise have seen a professional dance company.
And for 34 years, our holiday production, Granny Dances to a Holiday Drum, has become a Denver tradition — blending dance, live music and seasonal customs from around the world for families that have made it a part of their annual December celebrations.
That’s why the grand opening January 15 is far more than a ribbon-cutting. It is a powerful reminder of the remarkable ability of the arts to break down barriers, promote greater understanding and lay bare our common humanity.
We truly appreciate how Denver and Colorado have invested in our future. We will reciprocate that love by continuing to innovate and collaborate, to nurture young artists, preserve Black dance traditions and push creative boundaries while entertaining new generations. That means staying accessible, inclusive and relevant to all. We will never veer from that mission.
As I walk through our new space, I am grateful to all the people who made this possible: my parents, our founding company members, our generous partners and donors, and every child who has taken a first leap with us.
Malik Robinson is the president and CEO at Cleo Parker Robinson Dance in Denver Colorado.
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.
Jeff Koterba, Omaha World-Herald Dave Granlund, PoliticalCartoons.com
Cartoons
It’s been a big week for President Donald Trump.
CartoonsIt’s been a big week for President Donald Trump.
Last Tuesday he delivered a State of the Union address that included a Presidential Medal of Freedom for Rush Limbaugh and Nancy Pelosi ripping up a ceremonial copy of the speech.
The next day he was acquitted of impeachment charges by a GOP-controlled Senate and he subsequently removed a number of employees who testified as part of the House investigation from the White House.
And then this week his longtime ally, Roger Stone, caught a break when DOJ officials decided to step in and reduce their recommended sentence, prompting all four trial attorneys to resign or withdraw from the case.
Laboratory name change spells trouble
Re: “The National Renewable Energy Lab is renamed,” Dec. 3 news story
Re: “The National Renewable Energy Lab is renamed,” Dec. 3 news story
Changing the name of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to the National Laboratory of the Rockies may seem inconsequential to the casual newsreader, but it’s a true harbinger of this administration’s brutal neutralizing of clean energy technology development in the United States.
It’s hard to know what the “Laboratory of the Rockies” will actually be; maybe something like analyzing professional baseball in Colorado or such. Regardless, the laboratory will soon lose its position as the leading applied science lab in the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Laboratory System for developing marketable, clean energy technologies. This has been done primarily through NREL’s long-term research relationships with American business concerns.
Three more years of slash-and-burn of these relationships will cause irreparable harm to American leadership in this critical 21st-century sector, allowing China dominance for years to come. Bad news for Colorado, bad news for the United States. Very sad.
John A. Herrick, Denver
Editor’s note: Herrick is a former chief counsel for the Department of Energy’s Golden Field Office.
Forty-one years have elapsed since constructed in 1984, but hey, it’s never too late to make a change. “Renewable energy” is no longer permissible under the “climate realism” Orwellian newspeak of the new regime. The buildings remain in place on the southern slope of South Table Mountain in Golden, but the National Renewable Energy Lab is now the National Laboratory of the Rockies. Wonder what they will be doing there?
Phil Nelson, Golden
Re: “Law requires anti-slip devices for 2WD vehicles,” Nov. 22 news story
Can CDOT and the state legislature as a whole imagine the drivers of all two-wheel drive vehicles on many miles of Interstate 70 stopping at the same time to install “anti-slip devices” when snows begin? That is what their new law requires. And notably, many miles of the highway now have an express lane, which “disappeared” formerly safe shoulders. Additionally, if you happen to have an all-wheel drive vehicle, note that if you are rolling on the last 59% of your thousand-dollar tire set’s tread in such weather, you will be breaking the law as well.
Thanks, to all of the genius legislators who so badly want to please the ski industry lobby.
Peter Ehrlich, Denver
Re: “Big Brother is tracking you – Denver’s descent into dystopia,” Nov. 30 commentary
Robin Reichhardt’s column oversells and underdelivers by a mile. Renewing an existing license plate contract is clearly not a “descent” into anything, and the details are as mundane as the license plate cameras on our toll lanes and money trees, er, mobile speed cameras. The piece misses a glaring point: The plate data is hard deleted after 30 days. While police can search it later, it’s not much later.
Among other things the author doesn’t like are data centers, which she used her imagination in describing and tying to Big Brother Denver. The internet is complicated, but there’s no causation between the license plate cameras and the CoreSite — or any other local data center. Flock’s data is not stored in Colorado. Even if it were, plate records contribute no meaningful portion to data center capacity, which is almost entirely videos of attractive people doing banal tasks, cat videos, and, of course, porn.
I do appreciate the writer’s description of herself as a “community organizer” rather than an “informed citizen.”
Bradley Rehak, Denver
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.